Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Mondelinge geschiedenismethodiek× | Levensgeschiedenisonderzoek× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Veldmethoden | Kwalitatief |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s | Early 20th century (Thomas & Znaniecki 1918–1920); systematised as interview method in the 1990s |
| Grondlegger≠ | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie | William I. Thomas and Florian Znaniecki (sociological tradition); Robert Atkinson (interview method) |
| Type≠ | Qualitative historical-empirical method | Qualitative research method |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 | Atkinson, R. (1998). The Life Story Interview. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761904496 |
| Aliassen | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM | life history method, life-history interview, biographical research, personal narrative research |
| Verwant | 6 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. | Life history research is a qualitative method that captures the full arc of an individual's life — or a significant portion of it — through extended biographical interviewing and analysis of personal documents. Rooted in early Chicago School sociology, the method treats each life story as a window into broader social, cultural, and historical forces. The researcher and participant co-construct a narrative account that illuminates how personal experience is shaped by, and in turn shapes, wider social structures and processes. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|