ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Online Weighted Sampling×Propensity Score Weighting (PSW / IPW)×
VakgebiedSurveymethodologieCausale inferentie
FamilieProcess / pipelineRegression model
Jaar van ontstaanLate 1990s–2000s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
GrondleggerSurvey methodology practitioners; systematized via probability-based online panels (e.g., Knowledge Networks, founded late 1990s)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypeProbability-adjusted online sampling techniqueCausal inference / reweighting
Oorspronkelijke bronDillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118456149Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Aliassenweb-based weighted sampling, internet survey weighting, online panel weighting, weighted internet samplingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Verwant46
SamenvattingOnline weighted sampling is the practice of recruiting respondents via internet platforms and then applying statistical weights to correct for unequal selection probabilities, coverage gaps, and differential non-response. It enables researchers to draw valid population inferences from web surveys by compensating for the structural biases inherent in online recruitment — including the fact that not all members of a target population have equal internet access or equal likelihood of joining a panel.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Online Weighted Sampling · Propensity Score Weighting. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare