Methoden vergelijken

	Notational Analysis in Sport	Performance Profiling
Vakgebied	Sport Leisure Studies	Sport Leisure Studies
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2004	1992
Grondlegger	Mike Hughes & Ian Franks; Mike Hughes & Roger Bartlett	Richard J. Butler & Lew Hardy
Type	Observational pipeline for systematic recording of match events	Athlete-centered profiling procedure grounded in Personal Construct Theory
Oorspronkelijke bron	Hughes, M., & Franks, I. M. (Eds.). (2004). Notational Analysis of Sport: Systems for Better Coaching and Performance in Sport (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN: 9780415290043	Butler, R. J., & Hardy, L. (1992). The performance profile: Theory and application. The Sport Psychologist, 6(3), 253-264.
Aliassen	Match Analysis, Performance Analysis (Notational), Hand Notation Systems, Tactical Notation	Butler-Hardy Performance Profile, Athlete Performance Profile, Construct-Based Profiling, Self-Ideal Discrepancy Profiling
Verwant	3	3
Samenvatting	Notational analysis is the systematic recording of the discrete events that make up a sporting performance, so that what happened on the field can be turned into objective, quantifiable evidence rather than the fallible recollection of coaches. Mike Hughes and Ian Franks, in their 2004 edited volume Notational Analysis of Sport, codified the discipline: define a coding system of actions, locations, and outcomes; tally events from video or live observation; and derive summary indicators that describe and discriminate performance. Hughes and Bartlett's 2002 paper on performance indicators added the crucial idea that raw counts must be turned into meaningful, normalized indices — and validated against the criterion of distinguishing successful from unsuccessful play — before they can guide coaching. Together these works ground a pipeline that runs from a structured observation scheme through reliable notation to interpretable performance profiles.	Performance profiling is an athlete-centered assessment procedure in which the athletes themselves, rather than the coach or sport psychologist, define the qualities that matter for their performance and then rate where they currently stand against where they would ideally be. Richard Butler and Lew Hardy introduced it in 1992 in The Sport Psychologist, grounding it explicitly in George Kelly's Personal Construct Theory: because people act on their own constructions of the world, the qualities used to assess an athlete should be elicited from the athlete. The procedure produces a visual profile of constructs, each scored for current and ideal level, with the gap between them — the self-ideal discrepancy — pointing to where intervention is most needed. Gareth Jones's 1993 work showed how these importance-weighted discrepancies structure cognitive-behavioral interventions and how the profile, repeated over time, tracks change.