Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Need for Closure Scale× | Schaal voor Rechts-Radicaal Autoritarisme× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Politieke psychologie | Sociale psychologie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1994 | 1981 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Donna M. Webster & Arie W. Kruglanski | Bob Altemeyer |
| Type≠ | Self-report individual-difference scale | Self-report Likert scale |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062. DOI ↗ | Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press. link ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | NFCS, Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, Webster-Kruglanski Scale | RWA |
| Verwant | 4 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, developed by Webster and Kruglanski (1994), measures a stable individual difference in the desire for a firm, definite answer to a question and an aversion to ambiguity and uncertainty. High need for closure is a key epistemic-motivation construct in political psychology, linked to conservatism, prejudice, intolerance of dissent, and resistance to belief change. | The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) is a self-report measure developed by Bob Altemeyer in 1981 to assess individual differences in authoritarian attitudes, including submission to established authorities, adherence to conventional norms, and aggression toward those perceived to violate social conventions. The scale measures three core dimensions: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism. It has become a cornerstone of research on authoritarianism, political attitudes, and intergroup prejudice. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|