ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

NASA-TLX×AttrakDiff/UEQ×
VakgebiedMens-computerinteractieMens-computerinteractie
FamilieHypothesis testHypothesis test
Jaar van ontstaan19882003
GrondleggerSandra Hart and Lowell StavelandMarc Hassenzahl (AttrakDiff), Martin Schrepp (UEQ)
TypeMulti-dimensional post-task questionnaire for measuring subjective mental workloadQuestionnaire measuring pragmatic and hedonic quality dimensions
Oorspronkelijke bronHart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 139–183). Elsevier. DOI ↗Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In M. A. Blythe, K. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology (pp. 31–42). Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI ↗
AliassenTask Load Index, TLX, NASA-TLXHedonic Quality Assessment, Pragmatic vs. Hedonic, UEQ
Verwant44
SamenvattingThe NASA Task Load Index (TLX) is a multi-dimensional subjective workload assessment tool developed at NASA Ames Research Center by Sandra Hart and Lowell Staveland in the 1980s. TLX measures perceived mental workload across six dimensions—mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration—allowing researchers and practitioners to understand the cognitive and affective burden of tasks and interfaces. The instrument is widely used in human factors, cognitive engineering, and HCI to identify task bottlenecks and evaluate system designs.AttrakDiff and the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) are assessment instruments for measuring user experience across multiple dimensions. AttrakDiff, developed by Marc Hassenzahl, evaluates the tension between pragmatic quality (functionality, usability, does the system do what I need?) and hedonic quality (beauty, emotional engagement, does it delight me?). The UEQ, developed by Schrepp and colleagues, extends this framework with additional dimensions including efficiency, perspicuity, stimulation, and novelty. Both instruments provide quantitative post-use assessment, complementing task-based usability testing with holistic experience evaluation.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: NASA-TLX · AttrakDiff/UEQ. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-19 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare