ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Neutrosophische uitbreiding van EDAS×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan20211995
GrondleggerStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeNeutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Oorspronkelijke bronStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F. (2021). A single-valued neutrosophic extension of the EDAS method. Axioms DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingN-EDAS (Neutrosophic extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: N-EDAS · CRITIC. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare