ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Neutrosophische uitbreiding van EDAS×Bayesiaanse BWM×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan20212020
GrondleggerStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F.Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J.
TypeNeutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3)Hierarchical Dirichlet posterior over weights via MCMC (JAGS) — group decision
Oorspronkelijke bronStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F. (2021). A single-valued neutrosophic extension of the EDAS method. Axioms DOI ↗Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingN-EDAS (Neutrosophic extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM-BAYESIAN (Bayesian BWM — Probabilistic Group Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: N-EDAS · BWM-BAYESIAN. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare