Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Multiple Case-Based Reflexive Thematic Analysis× | Grounded Theory× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief onderzoek |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2006 (RTA origins); 2010s onward (combined application) | 1967 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Braun & Clarke (reflexive thematic analysis); Yin (multiple case study framework) | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Type≠ | Qualitative research design and analysis approach | Method |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953246 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | MC-RTA, multi-case reflexive thematic analysis, cross-case reflexive thematic analysis, multiple case RTA | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Multiple case-based reflexive thematic analysis integrates Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) with a multiple case study framework. Qualitative data are collected from two or more bounded cases, RTA is applied within each case to generate case-specific themes, and the themes are then compared and synthesised across cases. The approach preserves the depth and interpretive richness of RTA while enabling cross-case pattern recognition that single-case designs cannot provide. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|