Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Meerdere casus-gebaseerde digitale etnografie× | Vergelijkende etnografie× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) |
| Grondlegger≠ | Christine Hine (virtual ethnography); Sarah Pink et al. (digital ethnography); cross-case logic from Robert Yin | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) |
| Type | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761958956 | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | multi-case digital ethnography, comparative digital ethnography, cross-case digital ethnography, multi-site digital ethnography | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation |
| Verwant≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Multiple case-based digital ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts ethnographic fieldwork across two or more purposefully selected digital sites or communities, then systematically compares findings across cases. Rooted in digital ethnography's immersive, interpretive tradition and in multiple case study logic, it reveals both site-specific practices and cross-cutting patterns in online social life. It is especially suited to questions about how similar phenomena are enacted differently across digital platforms, communities, or cultural contexts. | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|