Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Schaal voor Betrokkenheid bij Mobiele Gezondheidstoepassingen× | System Usability Scale voor Gezondheidsapplicaties× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Gezondheidsinformatica | Gezondheidsinformatica |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2017 | 1996 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Oliver Perski, Anna Blandford, Robert West, Susan Michie | John Brooke |
| Type | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Perski, O., Blandford, A., West, R., & Michie, S. (2017). Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review, meta-analysis and integrated framework. European Health Psychologist, 19(2), 519–552. link ↗ | Brooke, J. (1996). SUS—A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Weerdmeester, A. Thomas, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis. ISBN: 978-0-7484-0635-1 |
| Aliassen≠ | mHealth Engagement, Mobile Health Engagement | SUS-Health, System Usability Scale, SUS |
| Verwant | 3 | 3 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The Mobile Health Engagement Scale measures the extent to which individuals engage with mobile health applications and digital behaviour change interventions. Developed through systematic review and meta-analysis by Perski and colleagues (2017), it captures both behavioural and psychological dimensions of engagement—frequency of use, depth of interaction, and subjective satisfaction—essential for understanding the effectiveness of mHealth interventions in real-world settings. | The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a rapid, validated tool for measuring perceived usability of digital products, widely adapted for health applications. Developed by John Brooke in 1996 and extensively validated by Bangor and colleagues, the 10-item SUS generates a single composite score reflecting users' subjective perception of ease of use, learnability, and overall system quality. Its simplicity and robustness have made it the de facto standard for usability assessment in health technology research. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|