Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Mobiele veldnotities× | Onderzoekslogboek× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Surveymethodologie | Surveymethodologie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2000s–2010s (digital turn in ethnography) | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology |
| Grondlegger≠ | Emergent from digital ethnography practice; theorised notably by Sarah Pink and colleagues | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) |
| Type≠ | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-1446287972 | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ |
| Aliassen | digital field notes, smartphone field notes, mobile ethnographic notes, in-situ digital notes | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary |
| Verwant | 6 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Mobile Field Notes is a data collection technique in which researchers use smartphones, tablets, or wearable devices to record observations, reflections, photographs, audio, or video in real time during fieldwork. By capturing data at the moment and place of occurrence, the method reduces recall bias and enables richer, contextually anchored documentation compared with traditional pen-and-paper notes written retrospectively. | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|