ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

m-Polair Hesitant Fuzzy uitbreiding van TOPSIS×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan20191995
GrondleggerAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
Typem-Polar Hesitant outranking/ranking — m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy Element (mHFE: m-tuple of HFEs, ℏ_m: Z → P([0,1]^m))Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Oorspronkelijke bronAkram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R. (2019). Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using an m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. Symmetry DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingMHF-TOPSIS (m-Polar Hesitant Fuzzy extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Akram, M., Adeel, A., Alcantud, J.C.R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: MHF-TOPSIS · CRITIC. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare