Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Gekoppelde cohortstudie× | Geneste geval-controleonderzoek× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Epidemiologie | Epidemiologie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | Mid-20th century; propensity-score variant 1983 | 1973–1977 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Established practice; propensity-score matching formalized by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) | Nathan Mantel (1973); D. C. Thomas (1977 formalization) |
| Type≠ | Observational analytic study design | Hybrid observational study design |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 | Thomas, D. C. (1977). Addendum to: Methods of cohort analysis: Appraisal by application to asbestos mining. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 140(4), 469–491. link ↗ |
| Aliassen | matched follow-up study, paired cohort study, propensity-matched cohort, matched prospective study | NCC study, nested CC design, case-control within cohort, density sampling case-control |
| Verwant≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | A matched cohort study is an observational design in which each exposed participant is paired with one or more unexposed counterparts who share key characteristics — such as age, sex, or comorbidity status — before both groups are followed forward in time to compare incident outcomes. Matching controls for measured confounders at the design stage, reducing bias that would otherwise require statistical adjustment alone. | A nested case-control study is an efficient observational design embedded within a defined cohort. For each participant who develops the outcome of interest (a case), a small number of matched controls are sampled from those still at risk at the same point in time. This density-sampling strategy yields odds ratios that approximate incidence-rate ratios from the full cohort at a fraction of the data-collection cost — making it the preferred alternative when measuring exposures for all cohort members would be prohibitively expensive or technically demanding. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|