Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Markov Land-Use Model× | Spatial Microsimulation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Human Geography | Human Geography |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1994 | 2016 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Mark R. Muller & John Middleton | Developed in the IPF/microsimulation tradition; synthesized for geography by Lovelace & Dumont |
| Type≠ | Stochastic projection of land-use/land-cover areas using a transition probability matrix | Method for generating and analysing synthetic individual-level populations within small areas |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Muller, M. R., & Middleton, J. (1994). A Markov model of land-use change dynamics in the Niagara Region, Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecology, 9(2), 151–157. DOI ↗ | Lovelace, R., & Dumont, M. (2016). Spatial Microsimulation with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. ISBN: 9781498711548 |
| Aliassen | Markov Chain Land-Cover Model, LULC Transition Matrix Model, CA-Markov Model, Markovian Land Change Model | Small-Area Population Synthesis, Synthetic Population Generation, Geographical Microsimulation, Spatial Microdata Estimation |
| Verwant | 4 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | A Markov land-use model treats land-use and land-cover change as a stochastic process in which the area in each class evolves according to fixed probabilities of transitioning from one class to another between time steps. Estimated from two dated maps as a transition probability matrix, it projects how much of the landscape will convert from, say, forest to cropland or cropland to urban, assuming the future obeys the same transition tendencies as the recent past. Introduced to landscape ecology by Muller and Middleton in 1994, it is most powerful when coupled with a cellular automaton — the CA-Markov framework — that decides where, not just how much, change occurs. | Spatial microsimulation is a family of techniques for generating realistic synthetic populations of individuals within small geographic areas, by combining detailed but geographically coarse survey microdata with geographically fine but aggregate census tables. It estimates, for every neighbourhood, a population of individuals whose collective characteristics match the published margins — the right number of each age, sex, income, and tenure group — even though no survey directly samples individuals at that fine scale. Synthesized for the geographic community in Robin Lovelace and Morgane Dumont's 2016 book, it bridges the gap between rich individual data and small-area aggregates so that policy and behaviour can be modelled where people actually live. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|