ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Propensity Score Matching aangevuld met Machine Learning×Propensity Score Weighting (PSW / IPW)×
VakgebiedCausale inferentieCausale inferentie
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Jaar van ontstaan20041983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
GrondleggerMcCaffrey, Ridgeway & Morral (2004); Westreich, Lessler & Funk (2010)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypeCausal inference / matchingCausal inference / reweighting
Oorspronkelijke bronMcCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403-425. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
AliassenML-PSM, boosted propensity score matching, ML-augmented PSM, nonparametric propensity score matchingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Verwant66
SamenvattingMachine learning-augmented propensity score matching (ML-PSM) replaces the traditional logistic regression used to estimate propensity scores with flexible machine learning algorithms — such as gradient boosted trees, random forests, or LASSO — to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among covariates. The resulting richer propensity scores improve covariate balance and reduce bias in the estimated average treatment effect on the treated (ATT).Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Machine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare