ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

LOgarithmic Percentage Change-driven Objective Weighting×Additieve Ratio Beoordeling×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan20222010
GrondleggerEcer, F., Pamučar, D.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypeLogarithmic percentage change variance-based objective weightingAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Oorspronkelijke bronEcer, F., Pamučar, D. (2022). A novel LOPCOW-DOBI integrated sustainability performance evaluation methodology: An application in developing country banking sector. Omega DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingLOPCOW (LOgarithmic Percentage Change-driven Objective Weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ecer, F., Pamučar, D. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: LOPCOW · ARAS. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-19 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare