Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Longitudinale nomologische validiteit× | Nomologische Validiteit× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Psychometrie | Psychometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s | 1955 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onward | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Type≠ | Validity evaluation | Validity evidence framework |
| Oorspronkelijke bron | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validity | nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity |
| Verwant | 6 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time. | Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|