Methoden vergelijken

	Juridische inhoudsanalyse	Discourseanalyse
Vakgebied	Veldmethoden	Kwalitatief onderzoek
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	1940s–1970s (applied systematically to legal texts)	1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
Grondlegger	Interdisciplinary; foundational content analysis by Harold Lasswell (1940s); applied to legal texts by empirical legal scholars from the 1970s onward	Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
Type	Systematic qualitative-quantitative text analysis	Method
Oorspronkelijke bron	Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761915454	Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Aliassen	LCA, legal text analysis, jurimetric content analysis, statutory content analysis	DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
Verwant	6	2
Samenvatting	Legal content analysis applies the systematic procedures of content analysis to legal texts — statutes, regulations, judicial opinions, treaties, and legal commentaries — in order to identify patterns, themes, and trends across a corpus of legal material. It bridges qualitative legal scholarship and quantitative social-science methods, enabling researchers to draw reproducible, evidence-based conclusions about how law is written, applied, or has changed over time.	Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.