ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Linguïstische extensie van L2T-TOPSIS×Objectieve weging van criteria op basis van correlatie en standaarddeviatie×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan20102010
GrondleggerWei, G.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypeLinguistic outranking/ranking — 2-Tuple Linguistic Variable (2TL: (s_i, α))Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
Oorspronkelijke bronWei, G. (2010). Models for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making with 2-Tuple Linguistic Assessment Information. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems DOI ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingL2T-TOPSIS (Linguistic extension of L2T-TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wei, G. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: L2T-TOPSIS · CCSD. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare