Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Intrinsic-Extrinsic Religiosity Scale (I/E Scale)× | Systems of Belief Inventory (SBI)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Godsdienstpsychologie | Godsdienstpsychologie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1967 | 2011 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Gordon W. Allport & J. Michael Ross | James M. Holland, Jill M. Currier, & Robert A. Neimeyer |
| Type | Self-report | Self-report |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. DOI ↗ | Holland, J. M., Currier, J. M., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2011). The Systems of Belief Inventory: Factor structure and association with psychosocial outcome in bereavement. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 311–321. link ↗ |
| Aliassen | I/E Scale, Allport-Ross Scale | SBI, SBI-15 |
| Verwant | 4 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The I/E Scale, originally developed by Allport and Ross in 1967, is a foundational measure in the psychology of religion that distinguishes between two motivational orientations toward religion: intrinsic (religion as end in itself, source of meaning) versus extrinsic (religion as means to social, personal, or practical ends). This conceptual distinction has profoundly influenced decades of research on religious prejudice, moral behavior, and health outcomes. The original 20-item version has been refined to a 14-item form (I/E-Revised) that improves psychometric properties while maintaining theoretical clarity. | The Systems of Belief Inventory (SBI), developed by Holland, Currier, and Neimeyer in 2011, is a 15-item self-report measure designed to assess the coherence, flexibility, and adaptive function of an individual's worldview and meaning-making system. Originally validated in bereavement research, the SBI captures dimensions of spiritual and existential belief that predict psychological adjustment following loss or trauma. It measures three key aspects: existential meaning-making, negative religious coping, and hope. The scale is useful in grief counseling, trauma recovery, and any clinical context where worldview disruption occurs. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|