Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Interpretatieve Straussiaanse Grounded Theory× | Interpretive Constructivist Grounded Theory× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1990 (Strauss & Corbin seminal text); interpretivist grounded theory consolidation 1990s–2000s | 2000–2006 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin (Straussian procedures); interpretivist framing draws on Dilthey, Weber, and Blumer | Kathy Charmaz |
| Type≠ | Qualitative theory-building approach | Qualitative research design and analytic approach |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932517 | Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029140 |
| Aliassen | Straussian GT (interpretivist), interpretivist grounded theory, Strauss-Corbin grounded theory, systematic grounded theory | constructivist GT, interpretive CGT, Charmaz grounded theory, constructivist grounded theory |
| Verwant | 6 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Interpretive Straussian grounded theory combines the systematic coding procedures developed by Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin with an interpretivist epistemological stance. It uses open, axial, and selective coding — structured around a paradigm model of conditions, actions, and consequences — to inductively build a substantive theory from qualitative data, while acknowledging that the researcher actively constructs meaning rather than discovering pre-existing facts. | Interpretive constructivist grounded theory is a qualitative research design in which the researcher and participants are understood as jointly constructing meaning, and theory is built inductively from data through systematic comparative analysis. Developed by Kathy Charmaz as a departure from the positivist assumptions of classic grounded theory, this approach situates both the researcher and participants as active interpreters whose social positions, values, and interactions shape the categories and theory that emerge from the study. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|