ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Intuïtionistische uitbreiding van MABAC×Beste-Worst Methode×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan20212015
GrondleggerLi, Y.Rezaei, J.
TypeIntuitionistic outranking/ranking — Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number (IFN: μ, ν; μ+ν ≤ 1)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
Oorspronkelijke bronPamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016-3028. [Canonical MABAC source; cited in place of the retracted Li (2021) intuitionistic-fuzzy MABAC paper, doi:10.1155/2021/5536751.] DOI ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingIF-MABAC (Intuitionistic extension of MABAC) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Li, Y. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: IF-MABAC · BWM. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare