Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Geïntegreerde Bepaling van Objectieve Criteria Gewichten× | Additieve Ratio Beoordeling× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Besluitvorming | Besluitvorming |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2012 | 2010 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Type≠ | Integrated objective weighting (ENTROPY × CILOS product-normalisation) | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2012). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Aliassen | — | — |
| Verwant | 8 | 8 |
| Samenvatting≠ | IDOCRIW (Integrated Determination of Objective CRIteria Weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2012. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|