Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Human Development Index× | Gender Analysis in Development× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Development Studies | Development Studies |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1990 | 1989 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Mahbub ul Haq & Amartya Sen; UNDP Human Development Report Office | Caroline Moser; Naila Kabeer; Harvard Institute (Overholt et al.); March, Smyth & Mukhopadhyay (comparative synthesis) |
| Type≠ | Composite human development index | Family of analytical frameworks for gender in development |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | UNDP (2022). Human Development Report 2021-22, Technical Notes. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report Office, New York. link ↗ | Moser, C. O. N. (1989). Gender planning in the Third World: Meeting practical and strategic gender needs. World Development, 17(11), 1799–1825. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | HDI, UNDP Human Development Index, Human Development Indicator, Composite Human Development Measure | Gender Analysis Frameworks, Gender and Development Analysis, Comparative Gender Analysis, Gender Planning |
| Verwant | 4 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite summary measure of average achievement in three basic dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, knowledge, and a decent standard of living. Conceived by Mahbub ul Haq with Amartya Sen and first published in the UNDP Human Development Report of 1990, it was designed as a deliberate alternative to GNI per capita, asserting that people and their capabilities — not economic growth alone — are the ultimate criterion for assessing the development of a country. Each dimension is reduced to a normalized index between zero and one, and the three are combined by a geometric mean. | Gender Analysis in Development is the systematic examination of the different roles, responsibilities, resources, and constraints of women and men, and of the relations between them, in order to understand how development interventions affect and are affected by gender. Spanning a family of frameworks — the Harvard Analytical Framework, Caroline Moser's gender-planning approach, and Naila Kabeer's Social Relations Approach — it provides comparative tools to surface inequalities, distinguish practical from strategic needs, and design interventions and gender-mainstreaming strategies grounded in sex-disaggregated evidence. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|