Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Fuzzy AHP× | Multi-Attribute Utility Theory× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Besluitvorming | Besluitvorming |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1983 | 1976 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. | Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. |
| Type≠ | Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-based | Additive multi-attribute utility function |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗ | Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley ISBN: 978-0-521-43883-4 |
| Aliassen | — | — |
| Verwant | 8 | 8 |
| Samenvatting≠ | FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. in 1976. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|