Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Veldgebaseerde casestudy van één geval× | Single-Case Study× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) | 1984 (Yin's seminal protocol); 1995 (Stake's art-of-case-study framework) |
| Grondlegger | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| Type≠ | Qualitative case study design | Qualitative research method |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Aliassen | single-site case study, holistic single case study, naturalistic single case study, field case study | single-site case study, holistic single-case design, intrinsic case study, bounded case inquiry |
| Verwant | 6 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | A field-based single case study is a qualitative research design that investigates one bounded real-world case — an individual, program, organization, event, or community — in its natural setting through sustained first-hand fieldwork. Drawing on Robert Yin's systematic case study logic and Robert Stake's interpretive tradition, this design combines multiple data sources collected on-site to build a rich, contextualized account of a phenomenon that cannot be separated from its real-world environment. | A single-case study is a qualitative research design that investigates one bounded instance — an organization, program, event, individual, or community — in its real-world context through multiple converging sources of evidence. Developed into a rigorous social-science method chiefly by Robert Yin and Robert Stake, it is especially powerful when the case is unique, extreme, critical, or revelatory, and when the research question begins with 'how' or 'why' rather than 'how many.' |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|