Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Veldgebaseerde inhoudsanalyse× | Contentanalyse× | Discourseanalyse× | Etnografie× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief onderzoek | Kwalitatief |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1987 | Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018 | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) | c. 1922 (Malinowski's Argonauts of the Western Pacific) |
| Grondlegger≠ | David L. Altheide | Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell | Bronisław Malinowski (modern ethnography); rooted in 19th-century anthropology |
| Type≠ | Qualitative analytic approach | Qualitative / mixed-method research technique | Method | Qualitative fieldwork tradition |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Altheide, D. L. (1987). Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65–77. DOI ↗ | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ | Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in Practice (4th ed.). Routledge. ISBN: 978-1138504462 |
| Aliassen≠ | field content analysis, naturalistic content analysis, ethnographic content analysis, ECA | İçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis | Etnografi, participant observation, fieldwork, ethnographic research |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Field-based content analysis is a qualitative analytic approach that systematically examines documents, artifacts, and texts encountered or produced within a natural field setting. Originally formulated by David Altheide as ethnographic content analysis (ECA), it blends the systematic rigor of traditional content analysis with the reflexive, iterative logic of ethnographic inquiry, allowing the researcher to interact continuously with the data and revise analytic categories as new meaning emerges from the field. | Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. | Ethnography is a qualitative research tradition in which a researcher immerses themselves in a social group or community over an extended period — typically three to six months or longer — to study its culture, values, and behaviours in their natural setting. Originating in social and cultural anthropology, and consolidated as a rigorous method by Bronisław Malinowski in the early twentieth century, ethnography produces rich, contextualised accounts of how people live, work, and make meaning together. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|
|
|