ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Feminist Standpoint Analysis×Intersectionality Analysis×
VakgebiedGender StudiesGender Studies
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan19831989
GrondleggerNancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, Sandra HardingKimberlé Crenshaw
TypeCritical feminist epistemology and analytic frameworkCritical qualitative analytic framework
Oorspronkelijke bronHarding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. ISBN: 9780801497469Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗
AliassenStandpoint Theory, Feminist Standpoint Epistemology, Standpoint MethodologyIntersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis
Verwant44
SamenvattingFeminist standpoint analysis is a critical epistemology and analytic strategy holding that all knowledge is socially situated, and that beginning inquiry from the everyday lives of marginalized people — historically women — yields a more complete and less distorted account of social reality than the supposedly neutral view from dominant positions. Developed by Nancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, and Sandra Harding in the 1980s, it argues that the marginalized see both the dominant order and its underside, and that this doubled vision, when methodically developed into an achieved standpoint, can ground a 'strong objectivity' superior to claims of value-free detachment.Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 3 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Feminist Standpoint Analysis · Intersectionality Analysis. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-24 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare