Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Functionele Beoordeling van Kankertherapie-Algemeen (FACT-G)× | Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Oncologische verpleegkunde | Oncologische verpleegkunde |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1993 | 1989 |
| Grondlegger≠ | David Cella | Barbara Piper |
| Type≠ | Patient self-report questionnaire | Patient self-report multidimensional fatigue scale |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of a general measure. J Clin Oncol, 11(3), 570–579. DOI ↗ | Piper, B. F., Dibble, S. L., Dodd, M. J., Weiss, M. C., Slater, G., & Paul, S. M. (1989). The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum, 16(6), 751–758. link ↗ |
| Aliassen | FACT-General | PFS |
| Verwant≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The FACT-G is a 27-item self-report questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life in cancer patients across four key domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Developed by Cella et al. in 1993, it has become one of the most widely used generic QoL instruments in oncology research and clinical practice, translated into 40+ languages and validated across diverse cancer populations. | The Piper Fatigue Scale is a 22-item multidimensional self-report instrument that evaluates cancer-related fatigue across four conceptually distinct domains: behavioral/severity, affective/meaning, sensory, and cognitive/mood. Developed by Barbara Piper and colleagues in 1989 and revised in 1998, the PFS is grounded in a theoretical model of fatigue mechanisms and is widely used in oncology research and clinical practice to assess treatment-related and disease-related fatigue. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|