ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Expertinterview×Action Research×Delphi Methode×Focusgroeponderzoek×
VakgebiedKwalitatiefKwalitatief onderzoekKwalitatiefKwalitatief
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan1970s–1990s (methodologically systematized)194619631940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990s
GrondleggerMeuser & Nagel (methodological codification, 1991); roots in elite interview tradition (Dexter, 1970)Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & BradburyNorman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer (RAND Corporation)Robert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. Krueger
TypeQualitative research methodMethodStructured iterative expert-elicitation processQualitative data collection method
Oorspronkelijke bronBogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (Eds.). (2009). Interviewing Experts. Palgrave Macmillan. link ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗Dalkey, N. & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. DOI ↗Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244
Aliassenelite interview, key informant interview, specialist interviewParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative InquiryDelphi Yöntemi, Delphi technique, expert consensus methodfocus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup Araştırması
Verwant6156
SamenvattingThe expert interview is a qualitative method in which researchers conduct in-depth, semi-structured conversations with individuals who hold specialised knowledge, experience, or decision-making authority in a defined field. Unlike general population interviews that target subjective lived experience, expert interviews treat respondents as proxies for a broader institutional or professional knowledge domain. The method is widely used in policy research, organisational studies, science and technology studies, and applied social sciences to map tacit professional knowledge, reconstruct decision processes, and triangulate documentary sources.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.The Delphi method is a structured, iterative survey technique developed by Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer at the RAND Corporation in 1963 for eliciting and converging expert opinion on complex topics where empirical data are unavailable or insufficient. It collects independent judgements from a geographically dispersed expert panel over multiple anonymous rounds, feeding aggregated results back to participants after each round so they can revise their views in light of the group's collective position.Focus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Expert Interview · Action Research · Delphi Method · Focus Group. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-17 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare