Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Event Study Design (Causale Event Study)× | Shift-Share Instrumentvariabele (Bartik-instrument)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Causale inferentie | Causale inferentie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2021 | 2020 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Sun & Abraham (2021); Callaway & Sant'Anna (2021) | Bartik (1991); identification framework by Goldsmith-Pinkham, Sorkin & Swift (2020) and Borusyak, Hull & Jaravel (2022) |
| Type≠ | Dynamic causal panel regression | Instrumental-variable design |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Sun, L. & Abraham, S. (2021). Estimating Dynamic Treatment Effects in Event Studies with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 175–199. DOI ↗ | Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Sorkin, I. & Swift, H. (2020). Bartik Instruments: What, When, Why, and How. American Economic Review, 110(8), 2586–2624. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | dynamic difference-in-differences, event-study DiD, dynamic treatment effects, leads-and-lags model | Bartik instrument, shift-share instrument, Shift-Share Araç Değişkeni (Bartik Instrument) |
| Verwant | 5 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The event study design is a generalised difference-in-differences model that estimates a separate treatment-effect coefficient for each period before and after an intervention, tracing the dynamics of the effect over event time. Its modern, heterogeneity-robust form was developed by Sun & Abraham (2021) and Callaway & Sant'Anna (2021). | The shift-share instrumental variable, widely known as the Bartik instrument, is a causal-inference strategy that builds an instrument by interacting national or sector-level shocks (the shifts) with local composition weights (the shares). Its modern identification framework was set out by Goldsmith-Pinkham, Sorkin and Swift (2020) and Borusyak, Hull and Jaravel (2022). |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|