Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Ingebedde casusgerichte mixed methods× | Ingesloten kwalitatief-prioriteits gemengd ontwerp× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Onderzoeksontwerp | Onderzoeksontwerp |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2000s (formalized ~2007-2011) | 2007 (first edition of Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research) |
| Grondlegger≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark (embedded design); Yin (case-study framework) | Creswell & Plano Clark |
| Type | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1483358468 |
| Aliassen | embedded case-study mixed methods, case-centered embedded MMR, nested case mixed methods, embedded within-case mixed design | qual-dominant embedded design, qualitative-primary embedded MMR, embedded QUAL+quan design, nested qualitative-priority design |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Embedded case-focused mixed methods design combines a case-study unit of analysis with an embedded mixed methods structure, nesting one smaller data strand — typically qualitative — within a dominant primary strand — typically quantitative — all organized around one or more bounded cases. This design enables researchers to answer within-case questions at multiple levels, capturing both statistical patterns and rich contextual meaning for a specific case or set of cases. | The embedded qualitative-priority mixed design nests a secondary quantitative strand within a dominant qualitative inquiry. The qualitative strand drives the research logic, framing the questions, guiding data collection, and anchoring interpretation, while the quantitative component plays a supporting role — typically measuring outcomes, tracking context variables, or confirming patterns emerging from the qualitative core. The result is a rich, theoretically grounded account that remains rooted in participants' meanings while gaining empirical precision where needed. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|