Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Elaboration Likelihood Analysis× | Media Priming Experiment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Communication | Communication |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1986 | 1987 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Richard Petty & John Cacioppo | Shanto Iyengar & Donald Kinder |
| Type≠ | Dual-process experimental analysis of attitude change | Experiment testing how media attention changes the standards used to evaluate |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and Persuasion (pp. 1–24). New York: Springer. DOI ↗ | Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226388571 |
| Aliassen | ELM analysis, Dual-process persuasion experiment, Central and peripheral route analysis, Ayrıntılandırma Olasılığı Modeli Analizi | Priming analysis, News priming experiment, Agenda priming study, Medya Hazırlama Deneyi |
| Verwant | 4 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Elaboration likelihood analysis applies Petty and Cacioppo's 1986 Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) to study persuasion through experiments that cross message argument quality with peripheral cues under varying levels of audience motivation and ability to think. It identifies whether attitude change travels the central route — effortful scrutiny of arguments — or the peripheral route, reliance on simple cues like source attractiveness or message length. | Media priming is the process by which news attention to some issues, and not others, changes the standards people use to evaluate leaders, policies, or events. Demonstrated experimentally by Iyengar and Kinder in News That Matters, the priming experiment manipulates which issues the news emphasizes and tests whether those issues subsequently weigh more heavily in audiences' judgments — the natural extension of agenda setting from importance to evaluation. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|