ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Dynamische Entropiebalancering×Propensity Score Weighting (PSW / IPW)×
VakgebiedCausale inferentieCausale inferentie
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Jaar van ontstaan2012-20181983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
GrondleggerHainmueller (2012) for static entropy balancing; extended to dynamic settings by Blackwell and Glynn (2018) and subsequent methodologistsRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypeCausal inference / weighting estimatorCausal inference / reweighting
Oorspronkelijke bronHainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25-46. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
AliassenDEB, longitudinal entropy balancing, entropy balancing with time-varying treatment, sequential entropy balancingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Verwant66
SamenvattingDynamic Entropy Balancing extends the entropy balancing reweighting approach to settings with time-varying treatments in panel or longitudinal data. It constructs unit weights at each time period such that the covariate distributions of treated and comparison units are balanced on specified moments, adjusting sequentially for prior treatment history and time-varying confounders to estimate the causal effect of treatment sequences on outcomes.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Dynamic Entropy Balancing · Propensity Score Weighting. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare