Methoden vergelijken

	Dynamische Entropiebalancering	Dynamische Inverse Waarschijnlijkheids Weging
Vakgebied	Causale inferentie	Causale inferentie
Familie	Regression model	Regression model
Jaar van ontstaan	2012-2018	1986-2000
Grondlegger	Hainmueller (2012) for static entropy balancing; extended to dynamic settings by Blackwell and Glynn (2018) and subsequent methodologists	James M. Robins and colleagues
Type	Causal inference / weighting estimator	Causal weighting estimator
Oorspronkelijke bron	Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25-46.	Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560.
Aliassen	DEB, longitudinal entropy balancing, entropy balancing with time-varying treatment, sequential entropy balancing	Dynamic IPW, Time-varying IPW, Longitudinal IPW, Sequential IPW
Verwant	6	4
Samenvatting	Dynamic Entropy Balancing extends the entropy balancing reweighting approach to settings with time-varying treatments in panel or longitudinal data. It constructs unit weights at each time period such that the covariate distributions of treated and comparison units are balanced on specified moments, adjusting sequentially for prior treatment history and time-varying confounders to estimate the causal effect of treatment sequences on outcomes.	Dynamic Inverse Probability Weighting (Dynamic IPW) estimates the causal effect of a time-varying treatment sequence by reweighting observed data to mimic a hypothetical randomised trial. Developed by Robins and colleagues in the context of marginal structural models, it handles the challenge that in longitudinal settings, past treatment affects future covariates, which in turn affect future treatment — a feedback loop that standard regression cannot untangle.