Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)× | Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Cardiologie | Cardiologie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1989 | 2000 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Mark A. Hlatky | John A. Spertus |
| Type | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Hlatky, M. A., Boineau, R. E., Higginbotham, M. B., Lee, K. L., Mark, D. B., Califf, R. M., Cobb, F. R., & Pryor, D. B. (1989). A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index). American Journal of Cardiology, 64(10), 651–654. DOI ↗ | Green, C. P., Porter, C. B., Bresnahan, D. R., & Spertus, J. A. (2000). Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health-related quality of life measure for heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 35(5), 1245–1253. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | DASI | KCCQ |
| Verwant | 4 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that estimates functional capacity—the maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) a patient can achieve—based on their ability to perform common daily activities. Developed by Hlatky and colleagues in 1989, the DASI provides a non-invasive assessment of exercise tolerance and cardiovascular fitness equivalent to formal exercise stress testing, making it invaluable for risk stratification, treatment planning, and prognosis in cardiac and pulmonary populations. | The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item, multidimensional self-report measure that evaluates heart failure-related symptoms, functional limitations, and quality of life in patients with cardiomyopathy and heart failure of all severities. Developed by Spertus and colleagues in 2000, the KCCQ provides six disease-specific domains and a clinically summary score, making it ideal for comprehensive, domain-focused assessment in both clinical practice and research. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|