Methoden vergelijken

	Dubbelblinde Ontwerp met Meerdere Baselines	Multiple Baseline Design
Vakgebied	Experimenteel ontwerp	Experimenteel ontwerp
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	1968 (multiple baseline); double-blind extension applied from 1980s onward in clinical behavioral research	1968
Grondlegger	Multiple baseline: Baer, Wolf & Risley (1968); double-blind procedural extension adapted from clinical trial methodology	Donald M. Baer, Montrose M. Wolf, Todd R. Risley
Type	Single-subject experimental design with blinded outcome assessment	Single-subject experimental design
Oorspronkelijke bron	Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97.	Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97.
Aliassen	DB-MBD, blinded multiple baseline design, masked multiple baseline design, double-blind MBD	MBD, multiple-baseline single-case design, staggered baseline design, multiple-probe design
Verwant	5	4
Samenvatting	The double-blind multiple baseline design is a single-subject experimental design in which an intervention is introduced sequentially across two or more independent baselines — behaviors, individuals, or settings — while outcome assessors (and ideally participants) remain unaware of which baseline is currently in the intervention phase. The double-blind procedural overlay reduces measurement bias and demand characteristics, strengthening causal inference beyond what a standard multiple baseline design offers.	The multiple baseline design is a single-subject experimental design that demonstrates functional control by introducing an intervention at staggered time points across two or more baselines — typically across different behaviors, individuals, or settings. Because no withdrawal of treatment is required, it is especially suitable when the target behavior is irreversible or when removing an effective intervention would be unethical.