Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Digitale etnografie× | Discourseanalyse× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief onderzoek |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | Late 1990s – 2000s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Grondlegger≠ | Christine Hine (virtual ethnography); Robert V. Kozinets (netnography) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Type≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage. ISBN: 978-1847875228 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | online ethnography, virtual ethnography, internet ethnography, netnography | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Digital ethnography is a qualitative research method that adapts traditional ethnographic fieldwork to online and digitally mediated settings. Drawing on sustained participant observation, document collection, and sometimes interviews, the researcher immerses themselves in one or more digital communities — social media platforms, forums, gaming spaces, or messaging groups — to understand how culture, identity, and social practice are constructed through digital interaction. The approach recognises that online spaces are not merely reflections of offline life but distinctive sites of cultural production in their own right. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|