Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Gevestigde Theorie van de Digitale Constructivistische Grondslagen× | Digitale Thematische Analyse× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Kwalitatief | Kwalitatief |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2006 (base method); digital application 2010s |
| Grondlegger≠ | Kathy Charmaz (CGT); applied to digital contexts by qualitative internet researchers | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (base method); extended to digital data contexts by qualitative digital researchers from the mid-2000s onward |
| Type≠ | Qualitative theory-building approach | Qualitative data analysis method |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 | Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | Digital CGT, online constructivist grounded theory, digital-context CGT, constructivist GT with digital data | online thematic analysis, social media thematic analysis, digital TA, web-based thematic analysis |
| Verwant≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Digital Constructivist Grounded Theory (Digital CGT) applies Kathy Charmaz's constructivist variant of grounded theory to data generated in digital environments — social media platforms, online communities, forums, digital interviews, and other internet-mediated spaces. It treats meaning as co-constructed between researcher and participant in digitally-mediated contexts, and generates theory grounded in how people make sense of experience through and within digital life. | Digital Thematic Analysis applies Braun and Clarke's six-phase thematic analysis framework to qualitative data generated in or harvested from digital environments — including social media platforms, online forums, blogs, digital interview transcripts, and user-generated web content. It retains the same systematic coding logic as standard thematic analysis while incorporating additional decisions about data demarcation, platform context, and the ethical handling of publicly available digital material. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|