ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Dual Hesitant Fuzzy-uitbreiding van TOPSIS×Beste-Worst Methode×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan20202015
GrondleggerWang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q.Rezaei, J.
TypeDual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
Oorspronkelijke bronWang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q. (2020). New Distance Measures for Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Symmetry DOI ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingDHF-TOPSIS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: DHF-TOPSIS · BWM. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare