Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Dual Hesitant Fuzzy uitbreiding van EDAS× | Analytic Hierarchy Process× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Besluitvorming | Besluitvorming |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2023 | 1980 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Dual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. (2023). EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy information and its application to suppliers selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Aliassen | — | — |
| Verwant | 8 | 8 |
| Samenvatting≠ | DHF-EDAS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|