Methoden vergelijken

	Kritische Metafooranalyse	Kritische Discourse Analyse
Vakgebied	Kwalitatief	Kwalitatief
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2004	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
Grondlegger	Jonathan Charteris-Black	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
Type	Qualitative-critical textual analysis	Qualitative research method
Oorspronkelijke bron	Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-1403932921	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Aliassen	CMA, critical metaphor research, corpus-based critical metaphor analysis, ideological metaphor analysis	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
Verwant	5	6
Samenvatting	Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) is a qualitative method for uncovering how metaphorical language constructs, legitimises, or contests power relations and ideological positions in texts. Developed by Jonathan Charteris-Black (2004), it integrates Conceptual Metaphor Theory with the evaluative concerns of Critical Discourse Analysis to reveal the persuasive and ideological work performed by metaphors in political, institutional, and media discourse.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.