ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Complex Proportional Assessment×Objectieve weging van criteria op basis van correlatie en standaarddeviatie×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan19962010
GrondleggerZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypeProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
Oorspronkelijke bronZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: COPRAS · CCSD. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-15 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare