Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Vragenlijst voor Samenzweringstendensen× | Schaal voor Politiek Vertrouwen× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Politieke psychologie | Politieke psychologie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2013 | 1974 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Roland Imhoff & Marko Bruder | Arthur H. Miller |
| Type | Self-report | Self-report |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225. DOI ↗ | Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951-972. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | CMQ, Conspiracy Ideation Scale, Generic Conspiracy Belief | PTS, Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Trust Module |
| Verwant | 3 | 3 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire measures individual differences in generic conspiracy thinking—the tendency to attribute significant events to hidden, coordinated group actions by powerful actors rather than to incompetence, chance, or transparent public causes. Developed by Bruder et al. (2013), the five-item CMQ assesses a stable dispositional trait that predicts belief in diverse conspiracy theories (JFK assassination, 9/11 truthers, anti-vaccine narratives, QAnon) and distrust of institutions. It captures conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude distinct from specific beliefs. | The Political Trust Scale measures citizen confidence in government institutions, elected officials, and the political system's responsiveness and fairness. Pioneered by Miller (1974) and operationalized across comparative electoral studies (CSES Module 5), the scale captures both diffuse trust (in the political system generally) and specific trust (in particular institutions such as parliament or the executive). It is central to understanding democratic legitimacy, political engagement, and support for democratic institutions. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|