Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Vragenlijst Gemeenschappelijke Factoren× | Form voor Nuttige Aspecten van Therapie× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Psychotherapieonderzoek | Psychotherapieonderzoek |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1992 | 1988 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Michael J. Lambert, Bruce E. Wampold | Sara P. Llewellyn; Robert Elliott |
| Type | Client-rated | Client-rated |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38(4), 357–361. DOI ↗ | Llewellyn, S. P., Foo, S., & Stam, H. J. (1988). Assessing psychotherapy outcome: Clients' perspectives. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 22(2), 191–206. link ↗ |
| Aliassen | CFQ, Therapeutic Factors Scale | HAT, Helpful Aspects Questionnaire |
| Verwant | 4 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The Common Factors Questionnaire (CFQ) is a structured client-report measure that quantifies the client's perception of therapeutic factors deemed common to effective psychotherapy across all modalities—including alliance, therapist empathy, client agency, goal clarity, and emotional expression. Based on Lambert's contextual model and Wampold's therapeutic relationship framework, the CFQ operationalizes the empirical finding that 70% or more of therapy outcome variance is attributable to common factors (relationship, expectancy, therapeutic environment) rather than specific technique. It is used in research to examine mechanisms of change and to compare common factors across therapy types. | The Helpful Aspects of Therapy (HAT) form is a semi-structured client feedback instrument designed to capture the client's perception of what was most beneficial or helpful in a therapy session or course of treatment. Developed by Llewellyn and refined by Elliott, the HAT combines open-ended narrative response with structured rating scales, enabling rich qualitative insight alongside quantitative comparison. It is used in qualitative outcome research and clinical feedback systems to understand mechanisms of change from the client's perspective. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|