Methoden vergelijken

	Bayesiaans Hypotheseonderzoek	Bayesiaanse Enquêteonderzoek
Vakgebied	Onderzoeksontwerp	Onderzoeksontwerp
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	1935–1961 (Jeffreys); extended by Kass & Raftery 1995, Wagenmakers 2007–2010	1980s–2000s (modern applied development)
Grondlegger	Harold Jeffreys (formal Bayes factor framework)	Thomas Bayes (theorem, 1763); applied to survey methodology by Donald Rubin, Andrew Gelman, and others (1980s–2000s)
Type	Quantitative research design	Quantitative observational research design with Bayesian inference
Oorspronkelijke bron	Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of Probability (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198503682	Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. B. (2007). Some issues on the foundations of statistics. In A. Gelman & J. B. Carlin (Eds.), Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521686891
Aliassen	Bayesian significance testing, Bayes factor hypothesis testing, BHT research, Bayesian inference testing	Bayesian survey analysis, Bayesian survey methodology, Bayesian polling, Bayesian questionnaire analysis
Verwant	5	4
Samenvatting	Bayesian hypothesis testing research is a quantitative design in which competing hypotheses are evaluated by updating prior beliefs with observed data to produce posterior probabilities and Bayes factors. Unlike frequentist null-hypothesis significance testing, it quantifies the relative evidence for each hypothesis, supports optional stopping, and allows accumulation of evidence across studies without inflating Type I error rates.	Bayesian survey research applies Bayesian statistical inference to survey data, combining prior knowledge or beliefs about population parameters with observed questionnaire responses to produce posterior probability distributions. Unlike null-hypothesis significance testing, this approach quantifies uncertainty directly, incorporates prior evidence, and yields probabilistic statements about parameters of interest — making it especially powerful for small samples, sequential data collection, and contexts where substantive prior knowledge exists.