ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Audit Experiment×Survey Experiment×
VakgebiedPolitical SciencePolitical Science
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan20112011
GrondleggerButler & Broockman (political responsiveness audits); Bertrand & Mullainathan (correspondence-audit lineage)Experimental political science; synthesized by Diana Mutz
TypeRandomized field experiment using matched fictitious requestsRandomized experiment embedded in a survey
Oorspronkelijke bronButler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI ↗Mutz, D. C. (2011). Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691144528
AliassenCorrespondence study, Field audit study, Discrimination audit, Responsiveness auditPopulation-based survey experiment, Survey-embedded experiment, Question-wording experiment, Framing experiment
Verwant44
SamenvattingAn audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.A survey experiment embeds a randomized experiment inside a survey: respondents are randomly assigned to different versions of a question, frame, or stimulus, and their answers are compared to estimate a causal effect. By combining the internal validity of randomization with the representative samples and rich measurement of survey research, survey experiments — especially population-based ones — let political scientists draw causal inferences about how information, framing, or message attributes shape public attitudes and behavior.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Audit Experiment · Survey Experiment. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-24 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare