ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Asset Poverty Trap Analysis×Asset Index Construction×
VakgebiedDevelopment StudiesDevelopment Studies
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan20062001
GrondleggerMichael R. Carter & Christopher B. BarrettDeon Filmer & Lant Pritchett
TypePanel-data test for nonlinear asset dynamics and poverty trapsComposite socioeconomic-status proxy index
Oorspronkelijke bronCarter, M. R., & Barrett, C. B. (2006). The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach. Journal of Development Studies, 42(2), 178–199. DOI ↗Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating Wealth Effects without Expenditure Data—or Tears: An Application to Educational Enrollments in States of India. Demography, 38(1), 115-132. DOI ↗
AliassenPoverty Trap Analysis, Asset Dynamics Analysis, Micawber Threshold Estimation, Dynamic Asset Poverty AnalysisWealth Index, Asset Index, PCA Wealth Index, Socioeconomic Status Index
Verwant44
SamenvattingAsset Poverty Trap Analysis tests whether households face nonlinear asset dynamics that can trap them in persistent poverty, using panel data on what households own rather than on what they earn. Developed by Michael Carter and Christopher Barrett (2006), the approach estimates the asset recursion — how a household's asset stock this period maps into its stock next period — and looks for multiple equilibria. When that mapping is S-shaped, there is an unstable equilibrium, the Micawber threshold, below which households converge toward a low-asset trap and above which they accumulate toward a higher equilibrium. This yields a dynamic asset poverty line and a structural reading of who is poor and likely to stay poor.Asset index construction builds a proxy for household wealth or socioeconomic status from observable possessions — durable goods, housing quality, and access to utilities — when reliable income or consumption data are unavailable. The dominant approach, popularized by Deon Filmer and Lant Pritchett in 2001, applies principal component analysis (PCA) to a set of asset variables and uses the first principal component as a set of weights, producing a single wealth score for each household. The method underlies the wealth quintiles reported in Demographic and Health Surveys and many other household surveys across low- and middle-income countries.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Asset Poverty Trap Analysis · Asset Index Construction. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-25 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare