ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Alternatieve Rangordemethode met Tweestapsnormalisatie×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan20221995
GrondleggerZdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeTwo-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregationStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Oorspronkelijke bronZdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingAROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: AROMAN · CRITIC. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-17 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare