ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Architecture Smell Detection×Model voor defectvoorspelling×
VakgebiedSoftware-engineeringSoftware-engineering
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan20092005
GrondleggerMartin Fowler and García et al.Thomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert Bell
Typepattern-based analysismachine learning model
Oorspronkelijke bronFowler, M. (2018). Code smell. Martin Fowler's Website. link ↗Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗
Aliassendesign smell detection, architectural debt analysis, system quality assessmentfault prediction, bug prediction, defect classification
Verwant44
SamenvattingArchitecture smells are recurring patterns in system structure that indicate potential design problems. Introduced by García et al. (2009), these patterns signal violations of architectural principles (modularity, independence, abstraction) at system scale. Detection combines code metrics, dependency analysis, and pattern recognition to identify smells early, guiding refactoring and architectural improvements.Defect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 3 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Architecture Smell Detection · Defect Prediction Model. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare